Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:16, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ITab[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that the article's current subject is notable–the article provides one source that goes to a mere mention in a book. Googling the acronym returns many different results, many of which appear to be more notable than the current subject. Specifically searching "Intelligence Training Advisory Board", its full title (and what the article's name should be) returned exactly one result. Fairly certain that's short of WP:ORGCRITE. Previously nominated for PROD by DGG, blocked by Student342, who wrote an argument on the talk page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. it's a directory entry. The talk p. argument is explaining why a directory entry might be needed, but it doesn't warrant an encyclopedia article. DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.