Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IT Media City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

IT Media City[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:NOTNEWS. Sources were news and there are no signs that it will ever be built. Fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 17:11, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:17, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:47, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:47, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: After eight days, there has been no discussion at all, and a Reflist to generate any discussion is preferable to a supervote.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — fortunavelut luna 09:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No coverage in reliable non-news sources found. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 16:37, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice. Can be recovered if this ever gets built or if plans receive more solid coverage. ~Kvng (talk) 20:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.