Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISLA Bank (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 17:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
ISLA Bank[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- ISLA Bank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As per WP:COMPANY: "It has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." The only reference is the company's website. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 08:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No sign of notability. Also seems like wp:coi. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 12:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: I tried various searches, including in Manila Times archived articles but didn't find anything to demonstrate WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 12:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
- Probably Keep - as with closer of previous AFD I found the argument of User:Robert Horning more convincing. How far back do Manila Times archives go? In ictu oculi (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.