Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISLAMIC CITY SCHOOL SUDHER, SWABI
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Firm consensus that GNG was not met Nosebagbear (talk) 19:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
ISLAMIC CITY SCHOOL SUDHER, SWABI[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ISLAMIC CITY SCHOOL SUDHER, SWABI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No supporting references, nothing found in my WP:BEFORE to indicate notability. Looks like a good-faith page creation but no chance of passing WP:GNG. At absolute best the page content indicates it might be (by some measures) popular, but this is not the same as being notable. Needs sourcing in reliable, independent sources. As written this is also WP:PROMO material - did consider WP:G11 speedy but thought (as it's an educational institution) might as well give it a chance of surviving if anyone can do better finding references. FOARP (talk) 18:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES no independent sourcing, utterly WP:PROMO, far, far WP:TOOSOON to establish notability.--Goldsztajn (talk) 11:36, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per Goldsztajn. Hughesdarren (talk) 13:16, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination and Goldsztajn. — Javert2113 (Siarad.|¤) 00:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom, fails WP:GNG--Wakowako (talk) 08:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - written as spam, zero sources at all, and badly fails my standards for schools. Bearian (talk) 17:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete seems like a promotional article to me. KingofGangsters (talk) 21:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.