Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Patna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No comments about keeping or deleting the article (just meta-comment about how to classify the topic) after multiple relists. RL0919 (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ISKCON Temple, Patna[edit]

ISKCON Temple, Patna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG WP:NBUILD no independent coverage in reliable media. Only press statement coverage about inauguration that keeps getting postponed. Venkat TL (talk) 18:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment This is really not an organisation page but a structure/building page in my view. So WP:NORG won't be applicable. The guidelines for such structures/buildings isn't usually as harsh from what I remember. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 00:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:48, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 01:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Missvain, Nomadicghumakkad, ok. I stand corrected. --Venkat TL (talk) 06:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All good. The ISKCON stuff is often troublesome and they're surely fond of promotion on Wikipedia. THanks for updating your nomination! Missvain (talk) 06:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with your observation about the cult. Venkat TL (talk) 07:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist, don't want to soft-delete due to other input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:36, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.