Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IME Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling at the RWTH Aachen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:40, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
IME Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling at the RWTH Aachen[edit]
- IME Process Metallurgy and Metal Recycling at the RWTH Aachen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete perhaps just short of blatant advertising but nothing indicating notability. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Previous discussion in 2007 reached no consensus: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IME process metallurgy and metal recycling. Thryduulf (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —Thryduulf (talk) 12:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete' as non-notable and advertising. Madcoverboy (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: I think it does cross the line into blatant advertising: The structural changes of the metal industry that have taken place during the last years have an effect on the qualification of engineers. In particular small and medium-sized companies demand interdisciplinary skills. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 17:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.