Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IGoodbye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Davewild (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IGoodbye[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't think this needs its own article at all. All the information it supplies is contained on the iCarly (season 7) page. StewdioMACK ^{Talk page} 14:46, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: Redirect to iCarly (season 7) as per WP:EPISODE.Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 17:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:32, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - IMHO it being the finale episode I feel it deserves an article, Laptop's being a dick so can't provide sources but I'm sure there's sources out there on Google News or Books. –Davey2010^Talk 01:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a bit marginal but AV Club had a detailed review[1] and it got other media coverage[2][3][4] although some is still pretty brief[5][6] There's also tv.com[7] and the ratings links in the article. I think that's enough material to write a decent article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a short response section but it could be improved. Colapeninsula (talk) 16:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. --Inother (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:35, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think enough sources have been found to satisfy notability requirements. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.