Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IFractal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IFractal[edit]

Non-notable consulting company. 306 Google hits, a number of which go to their blog. Delete. DMG413 02:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — fails WP:Corp. Feezo (Talk) 03:22, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Blahm 04:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Feezo. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 04:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not reach notability threshold. Gwernol 04:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable company, fails WP:Corp --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 06:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nn company. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC

So, it's interesting. Notability is the criteria? Is Google notability the only criterion for a quality company? Sure. Delete. That won't make the company go away, and won't make it so that the company isn't involved in some of the largest HR and organizational communication projects in the country.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.