Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IETBB

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AMILTON DE CRISTO. As usual with speedies, there is no predjudice against re-creation by an editor who is not blocked or banned provided the article clearly demonstrates the topic's notability and all the other usial rules are followed. Non banned/blocked editors with conflicts of interest would becwise to create a draft article and submit it for review via articles for creation. (non-admin closure) davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IETBB[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is possibly vandalism across different Wikipedia projects and has very few sources to back it up thus possibly failing notability. Possible conflict of interest may exist with regards to the author and two other users involved in the development of this article. Shalir Salim (talk) 18:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Articles in the "wrong" languages should be nominated for speedy or regular deletion on the respective Wikis. Editors who speak those languages may be needed. A steward or other globally-privilaged account should consider warning the editor or, if policies and guidelines dictate, blocking the account. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 19:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.