Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICY.EMAIL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:25, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ICY.EMAIL[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability, Fails EMAIL and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 13:57, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 14:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't cite any independent sources at all. I took a look and couldn't find any to cite. - MrOllie (talk) 14:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable, no reliable external sources. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 14:46, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article ICY.EMAIL was created for a purpose to include the webmail provider in question (ICY.EMAIL) into the list Comparison of webmail providers, as the list forbids entries of providers who don't have created article about them first. I would argue that this is a list comparing various webmail providers by their features, not a notability contest. It this case the notability is secondary, primary is the information value. The webmail provider in question (ICY.EMAIL) offers free webmail features comparable to, if not better than, many of other webmail providers on the list, 'notability' of about 50% of whose isn't any better than that of ICY.EMAIL. I would therefore argue that the entry in the list, and the related article, should stay, as it is a valuable contribution to this particular comparison table and its omission would unfairly champion the entries already on the list. NeonPuffin (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't create articles purely for lists, If it doesn't have an article - it doesn't make it on a list, If in this case the subject is found to be non-notable than the article will be deleted with the entry removed from whatever list it's on, As I said articles aren't ever created purely for list articles. –Davey2010^Talk 16:47, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Barely found anything about the webmail provider. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.