Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IBC Motion Pictures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IBC Motion Pictures[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is lookalike a fake only without any source and wrong content ---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 03:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 October 4. Snotbot t • c » 03:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This pinkvilla.com link suggests that it may not be a hoax but simply a non-notable company. My Google News searches provided nothing else aside from that pinkvilla.com link which would probably be unreliable and insufficient. Additionally, all of their credits are co-production which wouldn't receive any significant news coverage and probably small mentions. Considering that the company is Indian, it is possible that reliable sources may not be English. If this is the case, it would be better to add it to the appropriate Wikipedia India (Tamil, Hindi, Malayalam, etc.). To my knowledge, there isn't anything to improve this article. SwisterTwister talk 03:41, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:31, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for this REAL company's failure of WP:CORP. Seems they do produce films, but do not get any coverage themselves. If non-English sources come forward, my !vote is subject to reconsideration. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 02:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could see a few more sources, but all of them are passing mentions and does not pass WP:CORP. I also have huge doubts on the claims made in the article on the number of films co-produced by them. --Anbu121 (talk me) 10:10, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Indian production companies seem to produce far more films and in a far shorter span of time than do their Western counterparts. That understood, simply producing or co-producing lots of films does not impart notability. What we need is coverage of the company itself or of awards it might have received. These, we lack. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.