Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IAG Consulting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IAG Consulting[edit]

IAG Consulting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article currently lacks reliable independent sources. A search shows a number of possible sources but nothing that looks to me like like it would properly support notability. Mccapra (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Delete. Pretty much a WP:A7 case. WP:BEFORE shows that this is a smal localised consulting firm. Corporate bio-spam. Britishfinance (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Google News, Search, and Books all come up nil when I search for the page name and variations (along with the founder names). Not sure what other search terms to try but currently there is nothing that amounts to WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Nothing provided or found (including occasional quotation of the company's research papers on the role of requirements gathering, etc.) indicates this to be more than a consultancy firm going about its business. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 11:09, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There's only one source currently in the article and a basic BEFORE fails to find any others. Sort of a case of WP:PROMOTIONALISM. Fails GNG IMO. Chetsford (talk) 17:41, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.