Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I/O Kit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 11:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I/O Kit[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable development kit ThursdayMorningF (talk) 15:11, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 12. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Could not find any significant, secondary coverage. Best I could find was a tutorial. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 23:41, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly non-notable software; a WP:BEFORE indicates it has not received the sustained, in-depth coverage in multiple, independent relible source to pass our most WP:BASIC requirements.
Having said that, I am wholly curious as to a new account whose first edit is to file an AfD. Either there's a COI (admittedly of a negative kind), or Checkuser needed... ——Serial 17:38, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.