Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-wireless

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdraw. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 04:15, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I-wireless[edit]

The company does sell through Kroger - a major notability claim. However, there are several problems: only one secondary source is used, an overly promotional tone (some of which may be copyvio from an old version of the website), a logo used without any fair use declaration, and really bad layout requiring wikifying to even bring to par. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 04:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. This is a blatant advertisement, and no version of the page really appeared to do much more than (mildly or blatantly) promote the thing. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 06:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the G11 speedy based on the presence of a non-spam version in the history. And just as an aside on the logo, I'd actually argue that it's in the public domain per {{PD-textlogo}}. --jonny-m t 06:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Could only find two third-party references, but a fairly lengthy Forbes profile of the company confers some notability. Gr1st (talk) 11:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw Article has improved, and Forbes profile constitutes a reliable source. The bad layout, promotional tone, and other article issues are gone. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 04:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.