Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-League 2010-11 match results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:54, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I-League 2010-11 match results[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Excessive listing of match details for a football league season, violates WP:NOT#STATS. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 22:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 22:55, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. These results dont need to be in a seperate article, they can be summarised in a simple table in the main article. Eddie6705 (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Excessive detailing of something that is already sufficiently covered at 2010–11 I-League. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I-League results should be treated no differently than those of any other sports league, and although keeping track of game results is analogous to jaywalking when it come to WP:STAT, the other unwritten rule is that we don't allow multiple versions. In looking at the editing history of 2010–11 I-League#results, I'm satisfied that it has multiple contributors, and the person who created this article is just as welcome to edit that as any of Wikipedia's other I-League fans. Mandsford 00:08, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nom says it all really, no need for a seperate article. Giant Snowman 19:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.