Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypernormalism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. By its own admission, an idle, drunken, silly neologism. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 04:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hypernormalism[edit]
- Hypernormalism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This term does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria. The cited sources are not about the subject. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete = Creator of article admits it was a lark.[1] Recommend smacking the user with a fish and speedy deletion of his article. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 23:10, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: Speaks for itself. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above; I'd say the diff FMC cites qualifies it for a G7. I'd do it but I just speedied the last afd I !voted in. -- Vary Talk 02:43, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.