Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperhygienist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperhygienist[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Qualifies for deletion as per WP:NOTDICTIONARY and also because the topic does not meet WP:GNG. Source searches are only providing passing mentions (e.g. [1], [2], [3]). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 02:00, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe keep but remake as hyperhygience as Books instantly found results including from the beginning of the past century here and others at Scholar. This may simply need some familiar attention. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My search suggests its a neologism with not enough serious coverage as to suggest notability. Lappspira (talk) 11:08, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced neologism. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.