Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid-core computing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Convey Computer, merge Hybrid-core computing. This one is a bit difficult since this is a double nomination, and not all voters explicitly mentioned what article they are talking about. Still, the two voters who said smth about Convey Computer agree that it does not obey the notability policies; hence, it is deleted. For Hybrid-core computing, there is no ambiguous consensus, and merging into Heterogeneous computing seems to be the decision closest to consensus: All information is retained, and if ever this technology becomes notable or sources appear sufficiently demonstrating notability it can be restored.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hybrid-core computing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources for term, seems to be an advert. (Content seems already covered by heterogeneous computing, a marketing/proprietary fork of that article by a WP:SPA / WP:COI creator.)

I am also nominating the following related page:

No independent source for company, advert. Widefox; talk 15:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a mo\re thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 02:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Heterogeneous computing. Hybrid core technology is notable and will likely become important, but it's probably best to cover the topic in one article. As for Convey Computer, well there's at least one IEEE paper on the company's product[1] and it is mentioned in several others. Probably notable. Praemonitus (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The paper is a primary source for the product (so could be added to the Hybrid-core computing) and doesn't tell us anything about the company, we need secondaries for notability for both. Widefox; talk 13:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or at least Merge The article needs more meat, more examples, and something about its downsides (it sounds to me like the implementation would create a lot of incompatibilities). But it seems to me to be a valid concept in computer science. Listmeister (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SPAM. All edits of the creator are promoting the same product. Adblock2 (talk) 04:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:16, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Hybrid-core computing to Heterogeneous computing, per Praemonitus they are best covered in one topic. No opinion about the company. Thryduulf (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. smells of marketing--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 17:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Hybrid core computing is completely different really from Heterogeneous computing as a subject. Heterogeneous computing covers the whole gamut of computing as it stands processes, products, hardware, software. Hybrid core systems is a computing architecture that is new, but is becoming increasingly common. One early example is the current range of Intel Ivy Bridge processors which combine multiple GPU and CPU's cores. Other newer examples combine ASIC's with CPU to accelerate specific software types like High-performance computing. As regards the article itself, it certainly has plenty of WP:POTENTIAL and there is numerous sources in Google Books and Google Scholar. scope_creep (talk) 00:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reference for that, or is it wp:or? A quick wp:rs check didn't find the term used for Ivy Bridge, which is listed as Heterogeneous computing (which questions your assertion they are mutually exclusive). ...You've started me off now..."Hybrid" is used as a marketing wp:peacock term (for instance the notable "hybrid kernel"). What's the real definition of this wp:neologism, there's no reference?, and I don't have a wp:crystal! Widefox; talk 13:08, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Hybrid-core computing with Heterogenous computing per WP:CONTENTFORK, delete Convey Computer per WP:SPAM. Miniapolis 20:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.