Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurts Publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hurts Publishing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't satisfy WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. MT Train^Talk 06:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing presently cited in the article that would satisfy GNG. Google results contain a large amount of background noise consisting of comments like "this ghastly behaviour hurts publishing". The name of this company makes it difficult to exclude that background noise and assess the Google results. "Hurts publishing"+texas returns nothing relevant in GBooks or GScholar. Neither does "Hurts publishing"+review (I'm looking for book reviews of course). "Hurts publishing" brings up nothing relevant in GScholar or GNews or GNewspapers or JSTOR. This is not an ideal search because quote marks can cause Google's search engine to omit results where the expression in question actually appears, for reasons I've never been able to ascertain. Hurts+publishing brings up nothing relevant in GNewspapers. James500 (talk) 11:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per James500. All the sourcing I can find are press releases, no evidence of secondary sources that would satisfy notability. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 04:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.