Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Irrigation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Th ε Halo ^Θ 13:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter Irrigation[edit]

ad for NN corp. -Steve Sanbeg 00:33, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:CORP. Leuko 03:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some external references and removed the copyvio. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —Xyra e l / 14:45, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficiently notable. Zaxem 02:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With 250 product patents and 40 trademarks, looks like a notable business. Google hits are massive. I would give this article the benefit of the doubt and keep. JungleCat talk/contrib 06:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and rename under its correct name "Hunter Industries". Ohconfucius 06:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
keep please this one is easy really with over 1,400,000 results on google Yuckfoo 08:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a patent search shows lots of reason this company belongs on wiki. ALKIVAR™ 20:27, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.