Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Fraser

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 00:37, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter Fraser[edit]

Hunter Fraser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is primarily based on primary sources, and when I tried to find some coverage, it was negative information related to a dispute with his former girlfriend, which is currently pending in court. Despite this coverage, I don't think it's about him per se, but rather about an event, and he has not been convicted yet, so we can't add it to the article per the WP:BLP guideline.

He is very early in his career, and this seems to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. Also, this article was created in bad faith anyway. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BADFAITH. Simzeit (talk) 20:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

1keyhole (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. per WP:Prof#C1 with a high h index and 28 papers with 100+ citations he clearly had an impact on his field. --hroest 18:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.