Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humma Humma

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 02:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Humma Humma[edit]

Humma Humma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not justify WP:NSONGS - Vivvt (Talk) 20:47, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Hi User:Vivvt this is a combined article for both the old song from Bombay which was clearly notable as it was listed in top indian charts. and also re-released by a movie. so Condition #1 and #3 of WP:NSONGS are justified. may I know your specific concern why it fails WP:NSONGS ? --DBigXray 12:26, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @DBigXray: Topping the charts does not justify the notability and that is clearly mentioned in WP:NSONGS#1. The song independently did not win any awards to satisfy #2 and lastly, it has not been independently released. It was remixed and released into film's soundtrack. Plus, look at the article for now. Nothing it mentions other than its original and remake with 2 spam links for lyrics. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:08, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please read WP:NSONGS again. Chart rankings and SIGCOV define notability, the latter more so. SIGCOV, WP:NSONGS#1 (charts) and #3 (since it was re-released) apply here. The song is an AR Rahman's cult classic[1] . AR Rahman's superhit song Humma Humma from the 1995 Mani Ratnam film Bombay is a classic in the truest sense of the word. Here are the sources [2][3][4][5][6][7] --DBigXray 16:29, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • We are here discussing the Notability of this article. Not its content. WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP--DBigXray 16:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Watch: This sitar cover of AR Rahman's cult classic 'Humma Humma' is just magical". 25 April 2017.
  2. ^ Gulazāra; Nihalani, Govind; Chatterjee, Saibal (10 August 2018). "Encyclopaedia of Hindi Cinema". Popular Prakashan – via Google Books.
  3. ^ "Humma Humma: Remo Fernandes damns the OK Jaanu song as pale, insipid". 17 December 2016.
  4. ^ "Remo is right in criticising Humma Humma: Remake composer Tanishk Bagchi". 21 December 2016.
  5. ^ "Humma Humma to Tamma Tamma — he's Bolly's music man of the moment. Meet Calcutta boy Tanishk Bagchi".
  6. ^ "Watch: This sitar cover of AR Rahman's cult classic 'Humma Humma' is just magical". 25 April 2017.
  7. ^ "A.R.REHMAN Special "humma Humma" Price in India - Buy A.R.REHMAN Special "humma Humma" online at Flipkart.com". Flipkart.com.
  • I am arguing 4 points to keep this.
  1. WP:NSONGS#1 Top charts over several years. (see sources above)
  2. WP:NSONGS#3 re released by another notable artist (in a movie)
  3. WP:SIGCOV and WP:LASTING
  4. WP:NARTIST's notable work Artist here being AR Rahman --DBigXray 15:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep WP:BEFORE was not tried. I can just echo what has been said above. I also agree that AfD is not for cleanup. Accesscrawl (talk) 17:15, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per DBigXray. Songs that chart are notable. James500 (talk) 18:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as passes WP:NSONG as a charting hit with substantial coverage, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 19:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.