Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humiliatrix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and redirect to erotic humiliation --Tony Sidaway 15:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Humiliatrix[edit]

Apparent original research, devoid of supporting cites. Delete. Karada 18:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Erotic humiliation. Per nom, article is WP:OR, and no adequate citations have been found despite several previous deletion initiatives (merge (2006), prod (2007)). Sources found so far tend to be commercial sex sites. Term means female humiliator — "Keep" proponents tend to insist this is a distinct subject, but such distinctions are usually gender role variations that fit entirely within range of Erotic humiliation. / edgarde 19:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC) edgarde 19:30, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and for that matter a sexual behavior can be see as a set of variations (smile) The questions is whether there is enough content for a separate article. In this case almost all the content is nonspecific. I suspect there is certainly enough for a good article, even in conventional sources, but loss of the material here is no handicap to anyone who might want to write one. DGG 23:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as per Edgarde. -- Schneelocke 08:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.