Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. StarM 03:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Humanology[edit]
- Humanology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Neologism and probably a copyright violation Wronkiew (talk) 01:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--I can't confirm the copyvio, but this sure is a neologism, and the article, which is completely unsources, reads like a freshman comp essay on an almost imaginary topic. No sources either. Drmies (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. NFT. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete article has no references or layout. The tone if it is way too inappropriate and belongs in a magazine. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 08:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it's related to this guy. Notability is not established. It's a commercial neologism. - Richard Cavell (talk) 09:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.