Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humane Science

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:06, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Humane Science[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded for being either an unsourced WP:NEOLOGISM or unsourced promotion of an institute called "Humane Science". The original editor has removed the prod but made no attempts to clarify either way or address the lack of sourcing.

Animal_testing#Care_and_use_of_animals already covers the same ground if this article is meant to be about carrying out animal testing humanely, while I can find no sources (or even any web content outside of their own site) about the "Humane Science Academy". McGeddon (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia has standards for what articles should include to be kept and what should be deleted. This meets no inclusion criteria that I know and fails with WP:DICTIONARY. Blue Rasberry (talk) 20:57, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM and WP:WINAD. PianoDan (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.