Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human penis size

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close Clear-cut WP:IDONTLIKEIT nomination. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 17:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Human penis size[edit]

Ok.... I'll just... redirect this AfD then. Now... why is there a page like this here? If not AfD then merge with Penis. Had little or no encyclopaedic material other then troll fodder. Amaraiel ^{Send Message} 07:31, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems to me you should try to demonstrate why this article shouldn't be in Wikipedia, not ask others to demonstrate why it should be. Perhaps you don't like the topic, but the article appears to be well-sourced and a notable topic. Being "troll fodder" is not a reason for deletion. Why exactly do you think it is not encyclopedic? — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 08:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well-sourced article with (surprisingly) encyclopedic treatment, including the cultural and historic context of the subject. The only way the material in this article could be dismissed as nothing more than "troll fodder" is if all potentially offensive coverage of this sensitive subject were to be considered "troll fodder", but Wikipedia is not censored. A proposed merge with penis is outside the scope of AfD, but would be inappropriate in any case, per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE. Baileypalblue (talk) 08:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I can think of no reason why it should be deleted. It's not the best article but is still very well done. The article is long and could perhaps be split into other articles. Regardless, it should not be deleted. OlYeller^Talktome 10:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as troll fodder. NaturalExuberance (talk) 12:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep no valid reason given for deletion. Seems to be a well sourced article about a notable topic. Any issues with the article could be dealt with by editing it. This page will probably make some people uncomfortable but that's no reason to delete. Given the length of this article and the fact that it focuses just on humans merging with the general penis article seems inappropiate to me. Dpmuk (talk) 14:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article, but can someone please delete the misleading image under flaccid length. Its on semi-protect, and the guy's hand is pushing down on the right picture. On the left picture, his legs are not flat on the floor, his spine and femur are are a 45 degree angle. I clicked the person's name who uploaded it and he has a lot of warnings and etc... The left photo has his legs up and no hand pushing down on the pubic fat pad. The right photo has his legs flat down and his hand stealthily pushing his fat pad down, to make it not noticeable. 71.54.173.253 (talk) 14:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC) (i dont want my username shown)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.