Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human body shape

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect (per snow and boldness) to Human physical appearance, non admin closure Whs itc hy 15:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Human body shape[edit]

I started cleaning up this article and then realised that (a) it's all covered much better elsewhere and (b) it's an attempt to recreate by stealth Human figure which was AfD'd recently. The editors of this article were editors of Human figure (some of them apparently block evading sockpuppets). Many of the statements in this article aren't borne out by the references. The material is covered perfectly well in excellent articles such as Human physical appearance and Secondary sex characteristics. I propose delete and redirect. andy 14:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and redirect. per Occam's Razor: we have Human physical appearance much better written than this. I don't see any reason to keep both articles at the same time. --Neigel von Teighen 14:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect per nom. Subject already covered. --Evb-wiki 14:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect per nom. Oh, and I don't agree with the "by stealth" part - it's more blatant than that. Vinay sockpuppets abound. :) --AliceJMarkham 15:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect will do in a second. Somehow, I don't think it's Vinay's socks doing it, more so if he made the original redirect. Whs itc hy 15:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.