Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Meta-Human Vampiric Virus (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Redirect to Shadowrun as a sufficiently plausible redirect. Eluchil404 (talk) 04:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Human Meta-Human Vampiric Virus[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Human Meta-Human Vampiric Virus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Plot detail from a role-playing game, written from an in-universe perspective, i.e., fancruft. I find no sources that would make this topic notable under WP:N or that would allow us to write a real-world-perspective article about it as envisioned in WP:WAF. The content is much too detailed, and the topic too obscure, to merge into Shadowrun. Sandstein 09:56, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Shadowrun#Races where it is already covered, per WP:ATD. No objection to merging content to that destination, but it seems adequate coverage at the target to me. Jclemens (talk) 01:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or weak redirect to Shadowrun. No WP:NOTABILITY outside that fictional universe and nothing to preserve. There are hardly any articles linking to it to demand preserving a redirect, but a redirect won't really do any harm either. – sgeureka t•c 09:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.