Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Macaws

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 02:16, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Human Macaws[edit]

PROD removed by originator. This is unsourced, a neologism, not notable, and Wikipedia is not a dictionary or guide to slang. JohnCD (talk) 20:15, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, non-notable neoglism. I restored the prod once so they apparently deleted it again after I warned them. Redfarmer (talk) 20:22, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable neologism. A search turned up basically nothing at all about this term; either way, Wikipedia still isn't a dictionary. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely non-notable. Gaffertape (talk) 21:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. -RiverHockey (talk) 00:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete any article with the words "up and coming" is trash. JuJube (talk) 01:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above, and as WP:OR. Bearian (talk) 16:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:OR --T-rex 00:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, quite weird. Definitely fails several criteria as noted by JohnCD. Nyttend (talk) 04:08, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.