Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humaira Kazi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Significant coverage has not yet manifested. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 11:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Humaira Kazi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested draftification with a single in-depth source (News18). Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Cricket, India, and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON. Not enough coverage exists currently for her, given that she hasn't played a single notable match yet. However coverage may well exist in the future when she starts playing matches. So currently fails WP:GNG, and not worth draftifying as will likely be over 6 months before sourcing begins to exist. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DON'T DELETE WPL is already a big tournament in women's cricket and she has already played 10 WPL matches in the inaugral edition. As on today, some information is avaialable from reliable sources, which is being gradually moved to her Wikipedia page. Kindly let the page stay. Thanks,Vikram Maingi (talk) 05:06, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of details have been added on this page and it is certainly worth retaining. Kindly review and share updates. Thanks,Vikram Maingi (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This page can be expanded upon. Abstrakt (talk) 15:04, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~KEEP~~ Waiting for more inputs so that the discussion can be closed. Thanks,Vikram Maingi (talk) 13:24, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neither of these are valid reasons to keep an article. Zaathras (talk) 14:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. My own BEFORE returned routine match reports and interviews, nothing approaching SIGCOV in SIRS. JoelleJay (talk) 23:04, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:59, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:TOOSOON and I would not oppose draftifying however it would probably be a long time before WP:RS appears. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Extra scrutiny of keep votes will be needed here, as there is off-wiki canvassing going on, per this tweet. Zaathras (talk) 14:03, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only two articles are on the page which would count to SPORTBASIC, and even then it's not SIGCOV to warrant a biography. SWinxy (talk) 20:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.