Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugs (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Editors are encouraged to improve the article's sourcing to prevent renomination in the near future. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🎉 _{(HAPPY 2023)} 09:45, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hugs (song)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There aren't any sources to prove notability, and I can't find any other reliable sources other than the one already in the article. Spinixster (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spinixster (talk) 09:26, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Found a long list of coverage from what I believe are all reliable sources: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Between all of those (and possibly more; this was far from an exhaustive search), I don't see why this shouldn't be a keep. QuietHere (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:NSONG with sources presented by QuietHere. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Satisfies WP:NSONG. Maybe should consider adding @QuietHere's sources to article. Belichickoverbrady (talk) 01:54, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.