Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard Philpott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Howard Philpott[edit]
- Howard Philpott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and only source is primary from the BBC. Quick Google did not turn up reliable sources. Tek022 | Comments? 04:47, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A man wih a media job but no evidence of individual notability. AllyD (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Levdr1lp / talk 03:02, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. Finnegas (talk) 14:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.