Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howard B. Chase

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howard B. Chase[edit]

Howard B. Chase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimally sourced stub, of the "Subject was a person who had a job, the end" variety, of a former chairman of the board of a media company. While this would be enough to get him an article if some actual substance about his work could be referenced to enough reliable source coverage about it to get him over WP:GNG for it, it isn't "inherently" notable enough to require keeping a 19-word stub that's referenced exclusively to a list of past presidents on the company's own self-published website about itself. Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify Agree, he has several mentions in GBooks, one in a magazine, but I only can get a snipet view, this looks like an article. [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 15:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep There are hundreds of articles about him in Newspapers.com. I've expanded the article a bit based on them and will develop the article further as we go along. But clear notability as a prominent trade union leader and public official, plus a wartime CBE (the highest a Canadian could get as the knighthoods were closed to them). Atchom (talk) 15:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Draftify Needs expansion. Likely passes WP:GNG once draft has been fleshed out. Deletion premature. NiklausGerard (talk) 19:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.