Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Petrushko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

House of Petrushko[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is unsourced and as such draftified by a reviewer and moved back to main space without improvement. Nothing found to show this is a notable subject. The claimed famous representatives seems false, the bishop of Krakow doesn't have the same name and his bio states "the eldest of three children to the poor farmers Józef Pietraszko and Anna Migdał " and the other (in Russian) says nothing about him being born into a noble family. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:34, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, wanted to nominate myself as helpless OR. Renata (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless improved and referenced Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:36, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Save Have you seen references in English and Russian versions? All tells that Dom from Paris lies instead of article! Гимназист1748 (talk) 11:54, 29 July 2019 (UTC)— Note to closing admin: [[User:[User:Гимназист1748|[User:Гимназист1748]] ([[User talk:[User:Гимназист1748|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/[User:Гимназист1748|contribs]]) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

I saw the sources that were in the original article or rather the total lack of sources. I have also checked the source that you added which doesn't help at all because

there are no foot notes so I do not know what this is supposed to support.
it is nothing more than a list of names
it does not cite its own sources for whatever it is supposed to be showing
it seems to be a personal genealogy website written by an local historian called Krasnolutsky, Alexander Yurievich and not as such considered as a WP:RS because as per WP:RSSELF "Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book and claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published sources are largely not acceptable."

I hope this helps you understand why I will not be withdrawing my nomination.

Oh and p.s. accusing another editor of lying without proof is a personal attack and you should avoid this at all costs or a block may follow. --Dom from Paris (talk) 13:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.