Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Hardcore events

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:46, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

House of Hardcore events[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Longwayround (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a WP:SPLIT from House of Hardcore. Are you claiming the parent article subject isn't notable? If that's the case, you should have included it in this AFD as well. postdlf (talk) 04:44, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent references. RomanSpa (talk) 11:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. That was my concern. The little I could find seemed to be self-published but I will freely own up to knowing nothing about wrestling since the days of Big Daddy. Longwayround (talk) 11:58, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this but Keep House of Hardcore article, as I was able to dig up plenty of sources for that one. We could probably source these events but I don't think House of Hardcore is notable enough to detail every show like this.LM2000 (talk) 02:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:20, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with LM2000. HOH isn't too notable to create an article with every show the promotion made.--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:32, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and merge While it's not notable on it's own, It's parent is notable. They should have the oppurtunity to merge this material and properly source it with the parent article.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 02:26, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Notability is not, however WP:INHERITED and I see scant evidence that each of these events is indeed notable. Longwayround (talk) 10:30, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - No it's not notable to have an article all to itself. But then that's why I suggested it be merged. Notability guidelines do not apply to content within the article.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 23:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.