Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Binary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus (non-admin closure) Leonard^(Bloom) 23:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

House of Binary[edit]

Non-notable album. Hemlock Martinis (talk) 02:24, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per WP:MUSIC#Albums, "the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles.....should include independent coverage". There was a 4 star Allmusic.com review already on the page before this AfD. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 03:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per WP:MUSIC#Albums - the band are notable, so is this album. sparkl_!sm ^hey! 07:42, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. - McCart42 (talk) 14:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May you disclose a reasoning for your AfD !vote? Thanks, RyRy (talk) 17:26, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per WP:MUSIC#Albums, all album articles must also meet WP:N and there is no automatic notability from the artist. The album has significant coverage in multiple, reliable third party sources and is therefore unnotable. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 15:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:53, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Wisdom of Harry per WP:MUSIC: "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article".
Unless there is noteworty information on the album that I missed a redirect is appropriate. Besides the track listing there is no noteworthy information in that article, so I don't consider a merge. The alllmusic link has only a rating, but not a review. --Amalthea^Talk 22:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.