Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House Broken (2009 film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn) with no other arguments for deletion. (non-admin closure) Ab207 (talk) 06:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
House Broken (2009 film)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- House Broken (2009 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no sources on Rotten Tomatoes. I did a WP:BEFORE search and found a review from Common Sense Media. Needs two or more suitable/reliable sources/reviews to pass NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Second review at CineMagazine [1] DonaldD23 talk to me 19:58, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
- I withdraw the nomination per WP:NEXIST since there are two reviews from Cinemagazine and Common Sense Media respectively. The Film Creator (talk) 12:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.