Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotlist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hotlist[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently short lived defunct website that lasted all of a couple of years. Given the user name of the original author, the article is basically a COI ad written by one of the company's founders. Not much left in the article after cutting out the worst of it, some click bait garbage really. The sources out there are mostly PR junk you would expect for any tech startup: a few fluff interviews, routine coverage about seed funding, and then darn the luck, turns out this wasn't the next big thing after all, and it seems to have quietly died without so much as a whimper. GMG ^talk 14:51, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:02, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States-related deletion discussions.--Nahal^(T) 09:41, 02 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete clearly fails WP:GNG and never made it as such it will probably not get any more coverage...ever--Dom from Paris (talk) 12:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete routine promotionalism in intent. Asfor having ceased, Once notable always notable , but the notability was very borderline to begin with. DGG ( talk ) 08:44, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.