Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hotel Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Waggers (talk) 13:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Hotel[edit]

fails Wikipedia:Notability (music), there one album isn't out yet and is on Silber Records, they have one secondary cite on adequacy.net giving a harsh review. Drunken Pirate (talk) 08:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 03:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep every band that has existed has had a bad review, if not several. This is an information page not to be based on one reviewers personal opinion of the music. Reading the history of his reviews indicates most bands getting a bad review including Sonic Youth. This puts hotel, hotel in good company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Misco42 (talk • contribs) 17:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Response The "harsh review" part was the least important part of my submission. AFAIK group fails WP:MUSIC due to having only the own album on a non-major label, they fail WP:BIO due to not having any non-trivial secondary sources. If you think this is a keep you should be able to provide a source that negates either of those two points or otherwise make a argument for notability Pirate^Argh!!1! 00:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:24, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:01, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:MUSIC. No indication of substantial outside references, no albums on notable labels... Tony Fox (arf!) 20:43, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. It is interesting to note that the one keep opinion treats this as an information page which to me means spam. This is an encyclopedia and as such provides encyclopedic material and not information per se. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.