Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Klub

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 11:03, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Klub[edit]

Hot Klub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced. Not notable Rathfelder (talk) 21:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment I'm a little torn here, because the club certainly played host to many notable bands, was almost certainly the focal point for the city's alternative music scene at the time, and very likely there are plenty of references in Dallas newspapers of the era, maybe even the occasional mention in a national music magazine. But as the author admits on the talk page, the article was pretty much created from memory as a nostalgia trip, and it's going to be almost impossible to find any RS without having access to a newspaper library, so unfortunately it may well have to be a delete. Richard3120 (talk) 00:54, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as this is familiar territory for me and simply none of this suggests the necessary notability improvements. Even with minimally better, this would still be questionable. SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.