Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Go Dreamworld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:34, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Go Dreamworld[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See also Hot Go Dreamworld, Hot Go Park, and Hot Go Spring Paradise, three promotional articles for theme parks that have not yet opened. Google search shows no independent coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is apparently intended as a combo AFD, as the second and third-mentioned have been tagged for AFD with link to here (although this AFD maybe was not formatted perfectly at first). So anyhow the following related pages are also nominated:

and check also:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment The nomination seems to be incorrect in asserting that all three theme parks do not exist. The second one seems to have been open since 2014. Its article includes reference that shows photo of a park ride and mentions 2014.--do ncr am 20:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, although some tagging and regular editing could be done and I wouldn't necessarily oppose the three being merged. However at least one of them does in fact exist, and theme parks in general seem fairly obviously notable (as public attractions). --do ncr am 20:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Searching on Hot Go Park yields December 2015 LA Times article confirming its existence (with a rare-in-China wooden roller coaster) as a "year old" park, and its growth (new roller coaster coming). And there's this linked LA Times article also from December 2015 that I think has more, but I just hit an access cutoff, and there's this September 2015 LA Times article. And I don't know about "hospitality.net" in general as a source, but it covers expected January 2017 opening of a big hotel at the theme park. --do ncr am 21:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane ^talk 08:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.