Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hosanna! Music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Integrity Music. The article being completely unsourced, there is nothing that can be merged. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hosanna! Music[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches are only providing passing mentions and name checks; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Could be redirected to Integrity Music. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:22, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:23, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect It's my understanding that it was an imprint of Integrity Music. I don't recall ever having seen a release that wasn't released as Integrity's Hosanna! Music. https://www.discogs.com/release/10753929-Praise-Worship-The-Solid-Rock/images is an example. The label was vital in transforming praise choruses of the Jesus Movement in the 1970s, where Maranatha! Music was a forerunner starting around 1975, and modern contemporary worship music that started with Hillsong Music Australia in the mid-1990s. However, there wasn't much written about that label that can't be covered with the parent label. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:46, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as above, seems a valid option given that it is an imprint label, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 21:34, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.