Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horror House on Highway Five

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Week keep is still a keep, I am not relisting for the fourth time. Tone 20:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Horror House on Highway Five[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor independent film with no known actors/directors, with no third party independent reviews Donaldd23 (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:50, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep as did find one reliable sources review here as Dread Central is a Wikipedia film project rs for horror films. Will look for more later, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 02:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Couldn't find much more, only this piece which says it is a cult film, and this piece where it is included on a best dvd of 2017 list, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:00, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (t · c) buidhe 08:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I see four unique hits in newspapers.com, three passing mentions and fairly good coverage in the Racine Journal Times of Halloween, 2014, here for subscribers, about a postman whose spooky secret was appearing in this film. Others mention the gag casting of an actor named Ronald W. Reagan appearing in a Nixon mask. That might amount to independent third-party coverage -- ? --Lockley (talk) 21:07, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PATH SLOPU 12:05, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but if and only if someone adds the citations found and writes up the reviews. Otherwise, userfy it with one of the proponents. Bearian (talk) 20:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:Do it yourself, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:24, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.