Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horn Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NJA (t/c) 07:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Horn Group

Horn Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by an account in conflict of interest. Would prefer community discussion on whether the article meets inclusion guidelines however. Personally, it has notability and reliable 3rd party source issues. NJA (t/c) 14:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

• Weak keep, as it appears notable. However, it should be checked for WP:NPOV. There is no need to delete, just to fix it up a bit. It's not beyond repair. Gosox5555 (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete, unambiguous advertising: a digital communications firm specializing in public relations, social media and interactive services. The agency helps companies establish and promote their brands and engage with their audience in any medium. Services include brand strategy and message development, creative and interactive design, social media marketing, public relations and web development.... expertise in enterprise software and services industries such as ERP, supply chain, CRM, business intelligence, SaaS and security.... approach combines the goal-oriented process of a large professional services firm with the streamlined efficiency of a boutique design agency.... Also, the "sources" seem to be trade awards and listings, investment related newsletters, or blogs - not the sort of coverage that yields notability. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like someone mistook Wikipedia for a business directory. --Calton | Talk 15:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.