Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honorata De Guzman-Manalo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:56, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Honorata De Guzman-Manalo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only references on Google were to her family. Is she independently notable? I dream of horses (C) @ 04:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (C) @ 04:46, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (C) @ 04:46, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No references that I can find about her. Her family has been discussed but that doesn't make her notable ipso facto. /wia /talk 13:07, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This article must not be deleted. It shows significance to the sect Iglesia ni Cristo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.78.24 (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What's the connection between Iglesia ni Cristo and the proposed deletion, out of curiosity? There's a connection with a family member (her husband), but what about Honorata's role in the church makes her notable? /wia /talk 14:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing anything here either but fanaticism from members of the sect.--RioHondo (talk) 02:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG.--RioHondo (talk) 15:06, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Shall not be deleted.--Dave07jeje (talk) 14:17, 12 October 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.83.192 (talk) [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.