Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honeynet Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 22:18, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Honeynet Project[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In its current state, the article repeatedly uses a promotional tone, and all its references are to its subject's website. MopSeeker (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Tone of the article is a reason to cleanup the article. See: Wikipedia:Deletion is not cleanup Numerous google books references (see links above.. Also a few Google News article (also, see above). The project also appears to have or had numerous chapters around the world (see link on the article page). Also, the reference section currently lists an article in tech magazine which is not a refence to the subject's website. (also on the article page). —Gaff ^ταλκ 02:35, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Here's Bruce Schneier talking about it. Ends with a bunch of links to other articles. --h2g2bob (talk) 03:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
snowball keep verifiable notability. -No.Altenmann >t 05:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article needs work for sure, but passes GNG as far as I can see. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable. Has WP:RS. The article needs editing, but that is not a reason to delete it. See WP:DINC. --Jersey92 (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.