Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honeymoon (1956 film)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation. North America1000 11:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Honeymoon (1956 film)[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Honeymoon (1956 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Non-notable film, does not appear to have received notable coverage in English or Russian (WP:GNG).--RTY9099 (talk) 20:46, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 September 16. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 02:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 02:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. May satisfy WP:NFO per [1] ref, which is an article that mentions that there was a memorial exposition related to the actor Pavel Kadochnikov who participated in this movie and which also very briefly mentions that this movie was shown during that memorial event (along with other movies which featured same actor) for a limited time. Other than that, it's not really a notable movie and the current article is kind of useless since it only consists of a couple of sentences describing the movie's plot.Omgwtfbbqsomethingrandom (talk) 03:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.