Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeworld Universe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JodyB (talk • contribs) 01:22, 25 December 2007

Homeworld Universe[edit]

Cruft. Not sourcable. No secondary sources dedicated to the topic. SharkD (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. SharkD (talk) 18:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (note: already here on the homeworld wiki) - this is not cruft, it is just old. In 2006, no one really cared about sources in such articles, and we should improve it, instead of deleting old material. There are certainly sources about this: it's the universe of a popular series that has had a major impact on a genre. User:Krator (t c) 19:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unless someone can establish notability through reliable sourcing, its probably not notable. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If I may go through the article section by section; "Games", an overview of the series, for which we already have specific articles for. "Motifs and Common Threads" should be deleted as original research. "Overview" contains some out-of-universe material which, if sourced, would be suitable for the specific game articles, but again is largely OR. "Fan Media" is of no real interest to this encyclopedia. "Infulence of Homeworld" is entirely OR. "Characters" - the single character mentioned has her own article, although looking at it I dare say it will be up for AfD itself soon. Marasmusine (talk) 11:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.