Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homepage hijack
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus (default keep). JERRY talk contribs 02:16, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Homepage hijack[edit]
- Homepage hijack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Duplicates information from several other places such as articles about internet safety, hacking and viruses. Redundant article reads as a how-to. Hardly seems to be about its own title. Aquillyne-- (talk) 15:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to me to be a good article needs a bit of clean up to make it more encyclopedia friendly but don't think it is gounds for deletion.--AresAndEnyo (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- -- pb30<talk> 03:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - totally unreferenced. seem the sort of neoligism that isn't important enough to have an article. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 01:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into Browser hijacking or since that is a currently orphaned stub in and of itself, merge both into Malware -- RoninBK T C 15:59, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.