Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homeopathic Materia Medica
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 21:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Homeopathic Materia Medica[edit]
Homeopathic Materia Medica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article lacks any references asserting notability, and is simply a definition of the term "Materia Medica" with repect to Homeopathy. As the article states, there is no such thing as "the" Homeopathic MM, and the much more notable Homeopathic repertory only warrants a subsection of the main homeopathy page. SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) 13:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This seems to be a reasonable stub that begins at the beginning, for a topic whose worthiness of an article seems also fairly self-evident, and should be susceptible of expansion by interested editors. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The topic has great notability having many thousands of potential sources so I have started to improve and source the article. Colonel Warden (talk) 18:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- comment your search is for all MM, not just homeopathic. The fact there seems to be no core MM for homeopathy seems to be part of the problem.
- Keep per the article's placebo effect. John254 19:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdrawn if people think this can be expanded (and are willing to do so) then I see no reason for delete at the moment, therefore I withdraw my AfD without prejudice. I would point out that Materia Medica is indeed notable, but a question about Homeopathic MM still exists. Hopefully the article will now be expanded or moved somewhere more appropriate. --SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.